文学院各学系于崇基学院利黄瑶璧楼设立摊位及举办多场课程谘询环节，让参加者了解入学及各项课程最新资讯，同时文学院亦于林荫大道设立摊位，为参加者解答入学问题。经过是次资讯日，相信参加者对文学院各学系有更深的了解，文学院热切期待来年于资讯日再与大家见面及交流。

由香港中文大学-北京语言大学汉语语言学与应用语言学联合研究中心主办的“2022汉学讲座（一）：我看美国汉学”将于10月28日举行，详情如下：

主讲嘉宾：徐志啸教授（复旦大学）
统筹及主持人：张健教授（香港中文大学）、冯胜利教授（北京语言大学）

会议ID：920 1892 1580
会议密码：375562

亦可通过以下链接进入讲座：
https://cuhk.zoom.us/j/92018921580?pwd=dHBIVVJ1ejYyNmJ1K1B1cjVRTmc2QT09

与一神教的人神关系不同，佛教的圣凡关系除了超越二元对立的彼此会通外，还在圣凡对接方面创设了多种具有中介性质的神圣象征，其中比较典型的体现应该是中国佛教的观音感应信仰。这种信仰借助各种神圣象征建构众生与观音的关系，形成偶像感应、圣号感应、经典感应、道场感应、咒语感应等信仰形态，从而既使众生与观音之间的对接通道多样化，也使观音的神圣性资源处于多元分割状态，极大地增强了观音信仰的便捷性、弥漫性和世俗性，由此激发而成的文化现象，如造像艺术的发达、经典的普及、名山的兴起以及名号和咒语的流行等，则成为中国佛教整体建构和发展机制中不可或缺的重大元素。

 

讲者
李利安教授 
西北大学佛教研究所所长
李利安，历史学博士，西北大学中国宗教史专业二级教授。西北大学佛教研究所所长，玄奘研究院院长，兼任中国社会科学院佛教研究中心特邀研究员，台湾人间佛教研究院荣誉教授以及浙江佛学院、中国佛学院普陀山学院、鉴真佛学院的研究生导师。主要从事佛教信仰史研究，出版《观音信仰的渊源与传播》《四大菩萨与民间信仰》《南北朝佛教编年》等著作10部；在《哲学研究》《世界宗教研究》《中国哲学史》等多种海内外报刊发表论文200馀篇；主持及完成国家社科基金重点项目《宋元明清时期中国汉地观音信仰研究》等多个国家社科基金项目。

无须报名，直接登录ZOOM，ID: 910 6024 1050（无须密码）

讲座将通过对佛教梵呗的历史、梵呗的文体，以及梵呗音乐特色等角度，解析梵呗的历史，以及所含的艺术内涵与音乐特色。讲座中将用实例讲解汉传佛教梵呗的各种腔系，以及梵呗的同曲变体特征等内容。
 

讲者
狄其安教授
上海大学音乐学院教授
狄其安教授，上海大学音乐学院教授，佛光山人间佛教研究院研究员、江苏盐城佛教梵呗研究会顾问。从事汉传佛教梵呗、作曲理论的教学与研究，尤其是对佛教梵呗的研究颇具成绩。出版《江浙沪梵呗》、《中国汉传佛教常用梵呗》、《中国汉传佛“瑜伽焰口”法会唱本》、《东渡寺梵呗》、《宝华山隆昌寺律腔梵呗》等著作。主持上海教委创新重点专案“江、浙、沪地区佛教音乐（梵呗）收集与研究”； 2016年度教育部人文社会科学研究专案“中国汉传佛教‘瑜伽焰口’法会音乐的记谱与研究”；2019年度上海市教委员冷门绝学专案“汉传佛教禅腔、律腔、上江腔三大腔系梵呗的收集记谱与研究”；2020年度国家社会科学基金专案“汉传佛教‘水陆法会’梵呗集成的记录与研究”。

讲座无须报名，ZOOM ID: 910 6024 1050（无须密码）

The talk will be started with a dialogue with the “significant others,” Charles Taylor and Jürgen Habermas. In 2007, Charles Taylor published A Secular Age. In 2010, Jürgen Habermas published An Awareness of What is Missing: Faith and Reason in a Post-Secular Age. As hindsight, it is not an incident for them to address the same concern on the issue of the secular in the beginning of new millennium. Although the philosophical stances of Taylor and Habermas are different, they nevertheless meditated on the similar cultural and political situation they have faced in Europe and North America, that is, the loss of some sort of religious significance and its cultural effect. Among other implications, their thinking would be properly understood without referring to the resurgence of religions in past decades, including the religious/nonreligious conflict or violence around the whole world. Turning to East Asia, should we be bothered by the same issue of secularity with which Charles Taylor and Jürgen Habermas are deeply concerned? Isn’t it a common sense nowadays to say that the dichotomy between the sacred and the secular can only be found in the Judeo-Christian world? If the dichotomy as such is absent in East Asian traditions, should we take it seriously?

Speaker
Prof. Lin Chen-kuo (林镇国教授)
Professor Emeritus of the Department of Philosophy, National Chengchi University (国立政治大学哲学系荣誉教授)
 

Speaker 
Professor Cristina Dondi
Cristina Dondi is Professor of Early European Book Heritage, and Oakeshott Senior Research Fellow in the Humanities at Lincoln College, University of Oxford. She is also the Secretary of the Consortium of European Research Libraries. During the period 2014-2019 she was the Principal Investigator of the 15cBOOKTRADE Project, funded by the European Research Council. 
Her research focuses on the history of printing and the booktrade in 15th century Europe, using surviving books as primary historical sources to understand the economic and social impact of the printing revolution on European society. Also, on the reconstruction of dispersed book collections and the transmission of texts in print.https://www.lincoln.ox.ac.uk/Fellows/CristinaDondi

Join us for this 90-minute session, during which Prof. James St. Andre of the Department of Translation and Prof. Tongle Sun of the Department of English will share their strategies for giving effective virtual and in-person research talks and poster presentations. The session will consist of a 60 minute presentation by Profs. St. Andre and Sun, followed by a 30 minute Q & A. All are welcome!

In this talk I present the concept “biological geo-body” to offer a new way to understand how military, cultural, and scientific forces in Southeast Asia strategically map a population’s identity in relation to colonial and post-colonial histories. It builds on Thai historian Thongchai Winichakul’s concept “geo-body” (1997), which refers to the mapping of territory with bounded sovereignty and discourses of national identity as the “We-self” versus the other. Drawing on my research on national genome projects, I show how the mapping of geo-body has evolved into the biological forces of population genomics. I compare two cases, the Vietnamese Genome Project, which is funded by a Vietnamese private conglomerate, and the Peranakan Genome Project in Singapore, to elucidate how the results from population genomic projects in Vietnam and Singapore reflect existing political and cultural narratives, in particular the varying notions of ‘Chinese-ness’. The cases illustrate the different ways in which the actors strategically differentiate and negotiate the ‘bio geo-body’ of the Vietnamese and the Peranakan (more particularly, descendants of Southern Chinese settlers intermixed with local Malays) in relation to Chinese identity and nationalism, thereby revealing how genomics is intertwined with local and regional histories, culture and politics.

 

Speaker 
Miss Tien-Dung HA (PhD Candidate in Anthropology, Stanford University)
Tien-Dung HA is a PhD Candidate in Anthropology at Stanford University whose research interests include anthropology of science and nation building in the context of Southeast Asia. She has also been awarded the Dissertation Fieldwork Grant by the Wenner-Gren Foundation and the Social Sciences & Humanities Research Council Doctoral Fellowship by the Canadian government. Her work has been published in peer-reviewed journals of BioSocieties and Big Data & Society. Prior to arriving at Stanford, she received a MA in Science & Technology Studies at Cornell University.

讲者
狄其安教授
上海大学音乐学院教授
狄其安教授，上海大学音乐学院教授，佛光山人间佛教研究院研究员、江苏盐城佛教梵呗研究会顾问。从事汉传佛教梵呗、作曲理论的教学与研究，尤其是对佛教梵呗的研究颇具成绩。出版《江浙沪梵呗》、《中国汉传佛教常用梵呗》、《中国汉传佛“瑜伽焰口”法会唱本》、《东渡寺梵呗》、《宝华山隆昌寺律腔梵呗》等著作。主持上海教委创新重点专案“江、浙、沪地区佛教音乐（梵呗）收集与研究”； 2016年度教育部人文社会科学研究专案“中国汉传佛教‘瑜伽焰口’法会音乐的记谱与研究”；2019年度上海市教委员冷门绝学专案“汉传佛教禅腔、律腔、上江腔三大腔系梵呗的收集记谱与研究”；2020年度国家社会科学基金专案“汉传佛教‘水陆法会’梵呗集成的记录与研究”。

1936年底，作为“海德格的孩子们”之一的卡尔・洛维特（Karl Löwith，1897–1973）因希特勒上台迫害犹太人而流亡日本，在航行途中靠岸基隆，走访台北。当时殖民地台北帝大的哲学科助手洪耀勋（1903–1986），受到京都学派接触早期海德格实存哲学的启蒙，对早期海德格哲学及其《康德与形上学问题》已有所回应。可惜二人错失了见面的机缘。及至战后，在我大学四年级时购读牟宗三先生的《智的直觉与中国哲学》（1971），始逐渐认识到华文哲学界对海德格哲学的判释。七十年代，牟、唐先后在我读硕士班时来台讲学，对台湾哲学界影响甚钜。时隔半个世纪之后，从东亚海域与岛屿的离散视角，将时间推回到一九三十年代的欧洲（德国）与东亚（日本、殖民地台湾与香港），重新叙写曾航经这座岛屿的洛维特、洪耀勋、牟宗三和唐君毅如何回应早期海德格的哲学，特别是《康德与形而上学问题》，并在这叙事背景下追问：人是什么？如何安居？
 

讲者
林镇国教授
国立政治大学哲学系荣誉教授

林镇国，国立政治大学哲学系荣誉教授，曾任台湾哲学学会理事长、科技部哲学学门召集人、荷兰莱登大学（1999–2000）、香港中文大学（2005）和美国哈佛大学（2012）客座教授，并长期主持多项整合型培育计划与研究计划。著有《空性与现代性：从京都学派、新儒家到多音的佛教诠释学》（台北：立绪，1999年）、《辩证的行旅》（台北：立绪，2002年）、《空性与方法：跨文化佛教哲学十四讲》（台北：政大出版社，2012年），合编A Distant Mirror: Articulating Indic Ideas in Sixth and Seventh Century Chinese Buddhism (University of Hamburg Press, 2014)、《近世东亚〈观所缘缘论〉珍稀注释选辑》（高雄：佛光文化，2018年）等书及中、英、日文论文多篇。